Saturday, September 29, 2018

Compassionate


Compassionate

Just then a lawyer stood up with a question to test Jesus. "Teacher, what do I need to do to get eternal life?"
He answered, "What's written in God's Law? How do you interpret it?"
He said, "That you love the Lord your God with all your passion and prayer and muscle and intelligence—and that you love your neighbor as well as you do yourself."
"Good answer!" said Jesus. "Do it and you'll live."
Looking for a loophole, he asked, "And just how would you define 'neighbor'?"
Jesus answered by telling a story. "There was once a man traveling from Jerusalem to Jericho. On the way he was attacked by robbers. They took his clothes, beat him up, and went off leaving him half-dead. Luckily, a priest was on his way down the same road, but when he saw him he angled across to the other side. Then a Levite religious man showed up; he also avoided the injured man.”
"A Samaritan traveling the road came on him. When he saw the man's condition, his heart went out to him. He gave him first aid, disinfecting and bandaging his wounds. Then he lifted him onto his donkey, led him to an inn, and made him comfortable. In the morning he took out two silver coins and gave them to the innkeeper, saying, 'Take good care of him. If it costs any more, put it on my bill—I'll pay you on my way back.'
"What do you think? Which of the three became a neighbor to the man attacked by robbers?"
"The one who treated him kindly," the religion scholar responded.
Jesus said, "Go and do the same." (Luke 10:25-37)

Of course, this is the fairly well known story of the “Good Samaritan,” and Jesus tells it in response to a question from a smart aleck lawyer. And basically, the question was this: “What do I have to do to have eternal life?” Or, “What must I do to be saved?” And you can just picture Jesus kind of grinning a bit as he throws the question right back into the lawyer’s lap: "What’s written in God’s law? How do you interpret it?" Jesus asks the question, the man gives the answer and then Jesus responds by saying, “Good answer! Do it and you’ll live.” But the lawyer did what lawyers do: he looked for a loophole. So, wanting to justify himself, he says to Jesus, "And just how would you define ‘neighbor’?"

Why’d the lawyer ask that question? I mean, he’d measured himself against both of the commands and figured that he’d aced the first one. Of course, keeping the second one, well ….. that depended on how you defined “neighbor.” In other words, the lawyer was asking, “OK, who’s my neighbor, and how much is that gonna cost me?”

Aren’t we like that sometimes? Trying to reduce God’s commands down to something with which we can live? We’d like to believe that loving our neighbor means loving people who love us, or at least loving people who are lovable. So, in that context, loving our neighbor means doing nice things for people who’ll probably do nice things back. And that’s probably what the lawyer was thinking, too. But the lawyer’s original question was, “What do I have to do to get in?” However, Jesus’ answer to that question didn’t tell him what he had to do to get “in,” but described what a person who’s already “in” looks like. Oh, the lawyer knew the right answers alright, but he was totally unprepared for what compassion looks like in real life.

The 15 mile journey from Jericho to Jerusalem was infamous. It’s about an eight (8) hour walk climbing 3,750 vertical feet. That’s like a 5% grade! Not only was it a steep climb, but along its path were numerous places where highwaymen would lie in wait for their next, unsuspecting victim. In fact, this route was so treacherous that it was commonly referred to as the “Way of Blood.” And, since Jesus didn’t call it a parable, it would have been a very believable story to those who were listening, and it’s a primer on compassion, or grace.

Jesus starts the story by referring to the victim as “a man….” Today, we’d probably say, “Some guy….” The man, likely a Jewish male, had been robbed, wounded and left for dead. He needed help in the worst possible way. And as the unknown victim lay half-dead beside the road, three different men come across him. The first is introduced as a priest. However, when he saw the man, he crossed to the other side and continued on his journey.

Now some have offered excuses for the priest by suggesting that he didn’t want to touch the man because he might have been dead. And if that’d been true, that would have made the priest ceremonially unclean and unable to carry out his duties. But notice that it says that he “was on his way down the same road.” In other words, he was leaving church. And if anyone was going to reflect the character of God, shouldn’t it have been the priest? You’d think.

The second passerby was a Levite. In Jewish tradition, a Levite was a member of the tribe of Levi who performed certain religious duties for the Israelites, including taking on certain political responsibilities as well. Now, at least the Levite went over and looked at the poor guy, but he was just rubber-necking. You know the type, don’t you? He’s the one who slows down and cranes his neck while driving by an accident scene to see what happened and then says, “Whew, I’m glad that wasn’t me!”? And just like the preacher, he did nothing to help the victim.

In other words, both of these men saw the victim, but ignored his need. These were two religious professionals caught up in a lifeless religion. Oh, they were plenty pious at church and all, but their religion didn’t affect the way they lived. And it would have been shocking enough if Jesus had told his audience that the victim was helped by some ordinary Joe. But it was a jaw-dropper to hear that the guy was a Samaritan who’d come to the aid of a Jewish man who had been ignored by his countrymen – twice.

When Israel and Judah divided, the ancient city of Shechem became the religious center of the Northern Kingdom. However, in about 883 B.C., the political capital of the nation was transferred by King Omri to his newly-built city of Samaria where it remained until it fell to the Assyrians. The inhabitants were promptly deported to various parts of Assyria, and colonists were sent in to fill the void. As a result, a mixed people with a mixed religion were established. They were half-breeds, “dogs,” and were considered unclean and to be avoided at all costs if you were a practicing Jew. In other words, being called a “Samaritan” was not a compliment.

So, it would have been easy to conclude that the Samaritan would’ve simply finished the guy off instead of coming to his rescue. In those days, “good” and “Samaritan” were never used together in the same sentence; there was nothing “good” about a “Samaritan.” But the passage says that “when he saw the man’s condition, his heart went out to him.” The Greek word is splagchnizomai, which means “compassion.” It’s a word that refers to the intestines, or bowels. It’s that feeling that comes from the deepest part of you since, in those days, the bowels were thought to be the seat of love and pity; a “gut feeling,” so to speak.

So, the Samaritan saw the same pitiful man lying in agony beside the road, but his heart couldn’t let him pass by without helping. And that’s the way compassion should affect us. It stirs us; troubles us; keeps us awake at night until we do something. And when the Samaritan looked at that suffering man lying half-dead on the side of the road, something happened in his gut; something made it impossible for him to simply walk away and do nothing. He didn’t decide to help this guy on the basis of how worthy he was. Remember, this is a Samaritan helping a Jewish casualty, He helped him because of how needy he was.

Frankly, there’s no logical reason why the Samaritan should have rearranged his plans or spent his money to help the enemy. Of all the people who passed the injured man, the Samaritan had the least reason to help. He was despised by society, and a good deed wouldn’t do anything to change his social status. He helped because the victim needed assistance. But not only was the Samaritan’s compassion based upon the need, rather than the worth of the victim, it caused the Samaritan to feel something so deeply that it had to be expressed in action. He didn’t pass by on the other side feeling all compassionate and then say “Godspeed!” He moved toward the injured man instead, and acted in relation to his need.

You see, compassion is not something that just magically happens. It takes effort. But only by moving toward people can we express compassion. Frankly, expressing compassion can be inconvenient. And don’t forget: had the victim been conscious and aware of who was helping him, he would have despised the help and, had the sandal been on the other foot, wouldn’t have returned the favor. But Jesus, in just six simple verbs, details the Samaritan’s compassion-in-action: (1) he went to him; (2) he gave him first aid; (3) he bandaged his wounds; (4) he lifted him on his donkey; (5) he led him to an inn; and (6) he took care of him. In every one of these acts he demonstrated compassion by responding in a practical, timely and unselfish way. In fact, putting the injured man on his own donkey meant that the Samaritan had to walk to the inn … uphill.

It’s also important to note that the Samaritan took care of the injured man. Let’s face it, we can’t help everywhere, and we can’t help everyone. But we can help someone, somewhere by providing physical and/or spiritual aid to a hurting soul. We can’t do it all, but we can do our all for some. And you’ve got to give it to this Samaritan guy. He went the extra mile. He took this man to an inn and saw to it that the innkeeper would look out for the recovering victim during his absence. He also promised that he would return and reimburse the innkeeper for any additional expense that he incurred while caring for the guy. And, to top it all off, he left two days’ wages to take care of the man’s needs, and didn’t put a limit on how much he would be willing to spend to see the wounded man healed. There’s nothing more the Samaritan could have done to show his compassion.

At the conclusion of the story, Jesus asks the lawyer one last question: “What do you think? Which of the three became a neighbor to the man…?”  The lawyer almost chokes on his reply. In fact, he can’t even bring himself to say the word, “Samaritan,” so he responds by saying, “(t)he one who treated him kindly.” (Yeah, “that guy”) Then, for the second time, Jesus tells the lawyer to "Go and do the same.” Why does Jesus say that? Because Jesus knows that that slick lawyer won’t turn to him for salvation until he turns from his dependence on “doing” something to earn it.

Isn’t it funny how the initial question asked by the lawyer, “How would you define ‘neighbor’?” became, “What kind of neighbor am I?” And perhaps we can identify with the lawyer’s first question, “What must I do to get to heaven?” The answer has been, and remains, the same: stop trying to inherit eternal life by doing something. Instead, believe in Jesus and trust that he paid the penalty for our sins. The truth is that we’ve got to get over ourselves because it’s not about us. It’s about Jesus and what He did for us.

Compassion is grace with a face. It’s the misery that we make our own that we can comfort; the want we make our own that we can satisfy. It’s the sin we make our own from which we can save another; and the gauge by which we can measure the sincerity of our faith.

Grace,
Randy

No comments:

Post a Comment