Absurd
“Now I would remind
you, brothers, of the gospel I preached to you, which you received, in which
you stand, and by which you are being saved, if you hold fast to the word I
preached to you — unless you believed in vain. For I delivered to you as of
first importance what I also received: that Christ died for our sins in
accordance with the Scriptures, that he was buried, that he was raised on the
third day in accordance with the Scriptures . . . .” (1 Corinthians 15:1–4)
The word gospel simply means “good news.” The central message of the Bible
is the gospel, or good news, about the person and work of Jesus Christ. In his
letter to the church in Corinth, Paul provided them with a very succinct
summary of the gospel: the man Jesus is also God, or Christ, and died on a
cross in our place, paying the penalty for our sins; three days later He rose
to conquer sin and death and give the gift of salvation to all who believe in
Him alone for eternal life. I wish I could be that brief.
The great reformer, Martin Luther,
rightly said that, as sinners, we are prone to pursue a relationship with God
in one of two ways. The first is through religion/spirituality, and the second
is by way of the gospel. The two are polar opposites. Religion says that if we
obey God He will love us. The gospel says that it’s because God loved us
through Jesus that we can obey. Religion says that the world is filled with
good people and bad people. The gospel says that the world is filled with bad
people who are either repentant or unrepentant. Religion says that you should
trust in what you do as a good moral person. The gospel says that you should
trust in the sinless life of Jesus because He alone is the only good and truly
moral person who will ever live.
The goal of religion is to get from God
things like health, wealth, insight, power and control. The goal of the gospel
is not the gifts God gives, but rather God – as the gift – given to us by his grace.
Religion is about what I have to do. The gospel is about what I get to do.
Religion sees hardship in life as punishment from God. The gospel sees hardship
in life as sanctifying affliction that reminds us of Jesus’ sufferings, and is
used by God, in love, to make us more like Jesus. Religion is about me. The
gospel is about Jesus.
Religion leads to an uncertainty
about my standing before God because I never know if I have done enough to
please God. The gospel leads to a certainty about my standing before God
because of the finished work of Jesus on my behalf on the cross. Religion ends
in either pride (because I think I’m better than other people), or despair
(because I’m constantly falling short of God’s commands). The gospel ends in
humble and confident joy because of the power of Jesus at work for me, in me,
through me, and sometimes … in spite of me.
“You mean to tell me God became a
baby …
The one asking the questions was clearly
puzzled. His thick eyebrows were furrowed in doubt and incredulity; his eyes were
squinted in caution, but bordering on bemusement. Though there were plenty of places
to sit, he preferred to stand. Apparently, he wanted to stay safely behind the
crowd, unsure, yet intrigued by what he was hearing. Throughout the lecture he
listened intently, occasionally uncrossing his arms to stroke his chin. Now,
however, he stood upright, punching the air with his finger as he queried.
… and that he was born in a sheep
stable?”
Truth is, he looked as though he’d just
walked in from a sheep stall himself, and sounded as if he honestly didn’t know
if the story he was hearing was just an urban legend, or the gospel truth.
“Yes, that’s what I mean to say, “ the lecturer responded.
“And then, after becoming a baby he
was raised in a blue-collar home? He never wrote any books or held any offices,
yet he called himself the Son of God?”
“That’s right.” The lecturer being questioned was
Landon Saunders, the voice of the Heartbeat Radio program. Nobody can tell the
story of Jesus like Landon.
“He never traveled outside of his own
country, never studied at a university, never lived in a palace, and yet asked
to be regarded as the creator of the universe?”
“That’s correct.”
The dialogue was a bit unnerving.
“And this crucifixion story. . . he
was betrayed by his own people? No followers came to his defense? And then he
was executed like a common junkyard thief?”
“That’s the gist of it.”
The authenticity of the questioner
didn’t allow you to regard him as a cynic, or dismiss him as a show-off, or a
whacko. To the contrary, he seemed a little nervous about commanding such
attention, and his awkwardness betrayed his inexperience at public speaking.
But his desire to know was just a little heavier than his discomfort. So, he
continued.
“And after the killing he was buried
in a borrowed grave?”
“Yes, he had no grave of his own, nor
money with which to purchase one.”
The honesty of the dialogue was
spellbinding. It was one of those rare events where two people were willing to
question the holy; two men standing on opposite sides of a deep chasm, one
asking the other if the bridge that stretched between them could actually be
trusted. And then there was a hint of emotion in the questioner’s voice as he
carefully worded his next query:
“And according to what’s written,
after three days in the grave he was resurrected and made appearances to over
five hundred people?”
“Yes.”
“And all this was to prove that God still loves his people and provides a
way for us to return to him?”
“Right.”
“Doesn’t that all sound rather. . .” He paused a second, searching for the
right adjective. “Doesn’t that all sound rather … absurd?”
Christianity . . . absurd? Jesus on a
cross . . . absurd? The Incarnation . . . absurd? The Resurrection . . .
absurd? That’d be like taking my Sunday school Jesus down from the flannel
board. I mean, wouldn’t we rather tell that guy how it made sense? You know, diagram
the dispensations; present fulfilled prophecies; explain the fulfillment of the
Old Law. That’s right. Covenant. Reconciliation. Redemption. Sure it makes sense.
Don’t describe God’s actions as absurd! Are you kidding me?
What God did absolutely makes sense. It
makes sense that Jesus would be our sacrifice because a sacrifice was needed to
justify man’s presence before God. It makes sense that God would use the Old
Law to tutor Israel on their need for grace. It makes sense that Jesus would be
our High Priest. What God did
makes sense. It can be taught, it can be charted and it can be put in books on
systematic theology.
But why? Okay, now that’s absurd. Because
when you leave the method and examine the motive, the carefully stacked blocks
of religious logic begin to tumble. That type of love isn’t logical; it can’t
be neatly outlined in a sermon, or explained in a paper.
Think about it for a minute. For
thousands of years, using his wit and charm, man had tried to be friends with
God. And for thousands of years he’d let God down more than he’d lifted him up.
He’d done the very thing he promised he’d never do. It was a fiasco. Even the
holiest of the heroes sometimes forgot whose side they were on. Frankly, some
of the scenarios in the Bible sound more like the adventures of Sinbad than
stories for vacation Bible school.
For instance, Aaron. Right-hand man
to Moses. Witness of the plagues. Member of the “Red Sea Riverbed Expedition.”
Holy priest of God. But if he was so saintly, what was he doing leading the
Israelites in fireside aerobics in front of the golden calf? Or, how ‘bout the
sons of Jacob. The fathers of the tribes of Israel. Great-grandsons of Abraham.
But if they were so special, why were they gagging their younger brother and
sending him to Egypt?
And then there’s David. The man after
God’s own heart. The King’s king. The giant-slayer and songwriter. He’s also
the guy whose glasses got steamy as a result of a bath on a roof.
Unfortunately, the water wasn’t his, and neither was the woman he was ogling.
And the other womanizer? Samson? Yeah, he was swooning on Delilah’s couch,
drunk on perfume, soft music and softer lights. He’s thinking, She’s putting
on something more comfortable, and
she’s thinking, I know I put those scissors in here somewhere.
Adam adorned in fig leaves with stains
of forbidden fruit. Moses throwing both a staff and a temper tantrum. King Saul
looking into a crystal ball for the will of God. Noah, drunk and naked in his
own tent. These are the chosen ones of God? This is the royal lineage of the
King? These are the ones who were to carry out God’s mission? It’s easy to see
the absurdity. I mean, why didn’t God just give up? Why didn’t he just let the
globe spin off its axis into oblivion?
But even after generations of people
had spit in his face, he still loved them. After a nation of chosen ones had
stripped him naked and ripped his flesh with whips, he still died for them. And
even today, after billions have chosen to prostitute themselves before the
pimps of power, or fame, or wealth, he still waits for them. It’s completely inexplicable.
It doesn’t have a shred of logic or a thread of rationality. And yet, it’s that
very irrationality that gives the gospel its greatest defense: only God could
love like that.
Sometimes, we just don’t see him, do
we? Maybe it’s because we’re expecting someone in a flowing frock with
silky-white hands. But Jesus is the lion of Judah, walking out from the dense forest
of theology and ritual to lay down in a brief clearing. In his paw – a wound –
and in his mane – stains of blood. But there’s a royalty about him that
silenced even the breeze in the trees. Bloodstained royalty. A God with tears.
A creator with a heart. God became earth’s mockery to save his children. How
absurd to think that such nobility would go to such poverty to share a priceless
treasure with such thankless souls. But he did.
Come to think of it, I guess the only
thing more absurd than the gift is our willful stubbornness to receive it.
Grace,
Randy